Brothers and power.. Centralization of the Reformer and the Moral Fringe

The Trends Center for Studies and Research has published a research study entitled “The Brothers and the Falling of Ideology in Front of the Lust of Power… The Centralization of the Reformers and the Moral Fringe ” addressed the Brotherhood’s philosophy of governance and how they exploited religion to market their purpose and satisfy their ecstasy by controlling governance.

According to the study, the Muslim Brotherhood usually claims to be an ethical group representing the Hanif Muslim religion, but by analyzing its behaviour on the ground, it becomes clear to us the exact opposite.

The Muslim Brotherhood coup in Yemen in 1948

Al-Mutawakkilite (Northern) Yemen was one of the rare independent Arab countries that were not subject to any colonization in 1948, except in part, Aden.

It was a British protectorate and applied Islamic law, the brotherhood has only found the claim to save Yemen “from ignorance, underdevelopment, and closure” to stage a coup against, the Imam Yahya Hamid ed-Din, who is the founder of the Yemeni Mutawakkilite Kingdom.

The coup was called the “Constitutional Revolution of Yemen” and led to the assassination of Imam Yahya, the elder and his two child grandchildren, his sons Al-Hussein and Mohsen were killed when they wanted to resist the coups in control of the royal palace and were left unburied eight full days.

Three of Imam Yahya’s sons, Qasim, Ali, and Ismail, were also arrested, the coup also resulted in a civil war of nearly a month in which a Yemeni 5000 were killed.
The great surprise demonstrated by the master’s thesis was discussed in 2010 at the University of Sherbrooke, Canada, based on documents.

That coupled to the migration of some 5800 Yemeni Jews, in an operation called “The Magic Rug” in late 1949 and early 1950 after the murder of those who considered him to be the patron of the national peace in Yemen, Imam Yahya.

The study indicated that the coup had failed several days after its execution following the restoration of Imam Ahmed bin Yahya.

The study noted that many articles of what was called the “Sacred National Charter” (the Constitution of Yemen after the coup), prepared at the general center of the Muslim Brotherhood even before the assassination of Imam Yahya Hamid ed-din.

Refer to a priestly state in the name of religion, starting with its name “The Sacred National Charter” and ending With the last article in it.

Article 39 provides that anyone who betrays or attempts to betray a meaning of this Charter with bad intent shall have betrayed God and Muslims and shall have the appropriate provisions.

Brothers syndrome and their ten bases

At the end of the study on Yemen’s coup, the study reviewed what the Brotherhood Syndrome called any combination of associated signs, symptoms, and phenomena that would result from any political interference by them to change the rule and turn against him.

-To beg for religion to reach their political, economic, and social ends.

– The aim of the group is ultimately to establish a theocratic rule to ensure that it remains in power only.

– The situation is worse than before they stepped in to overthrow the system of government.

– Involvement of international and regional forces in planning and usually the sole

– Violation of the purposes of religion and public morality before, after, and during their intervention.

– Justification and practice of violence.

– Religious division of society and multiplication of the concept of citizenship.

– Involvement of persons of different nationalities and suspicious, interrelated, and complex roles.

– It is difficult to write down the history of their intervention since they do not stop bringing the Seeker and the Observer into the cycle of denial.

Recognition is a denial of recognition, justification is the total falsification of the facts, and sanctifying their role, and demonizing the other.

– The group is dispersed, beaten with force from the outside, and broken up or divided gradually from the inside.
In two other parts, the study also explained how the Salami Party “Iraq Brotherhood” cooperated with the United States of America after it entered Iraq in 2003.

Although they consider it to be an “occupation” force, part three details how the Southern Islamic Movement was involved in governing Israel.

The study concluded that the commitment of Islamists to anything will only continue as long as it guarantees them access to power, or maintains their authority if they are in power.

The rule that has not changed for more than 90 years is that wherever the power is, Islamists then set out, but how did it come to that?